Langsung ke konten utama

Our English Curriculum needs its own Analysis

final exemination



Final examination held several months ago for Senor High School and also Vocational School. This week students of the school are doing their school examination including practice examinations. English as the one of the main lesson is examined both in national examination and practice examination. Those examinations for English seem very serious and will give a lot of significant English skill for the students. But, is it true that by the processes English skill of the learner will be capable to be implemented in university or in their job next?
    Honestly, we have to say that in fact, our English learning in the Senior or vocational school are not suitable with the students needs. Our English curriculum today is over believed with genre learning model. Every day, every moment, teaching and learning English in the school always discus about a genre of a text. The teacher reads the characteristic of a text. The students also should memories the characteristic. In every examination, the largest number of the test task is about genre. The better the student memories the characteristic of a genre, the better his or her score test.

     Our education should evaluate the curriculum of English learning. Not all of students will be a novelist or have reading hobby such the genre method teaches them. Some of the students will continue their education into university. Some other students will look for job. The English learning processes should observe about those facts. Our education should give drill for the students needs about English. Between students who will continue their study to university and will look for job need English differently.
   The differences are in using the language. Be sides for entering university test, the student who will continue his or her study needs English for learning the university study materials. He needs English to read literature correlate with his major study. For student who will look for job, they need English for full fill job requirements such interview. Furthermore, for them, English also uses to maximize their work.   Despite of that, both of the students need English to help their interaction in their social relation.
So, when this book tells a lot about need analysis, we as a teacher candidate have to master about mechanism in observing the needs of learner about English. We have to be able to change or develop the genre method into better method which is more appropriate with Indonesian Senior High schools’ or Vocational schools’ students needs.

Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Substitution: A Grammatical Cohesion

Grammatical Cohesion According to Halliday and Hasan (1976: 4), cohesion occurs when the interpretation of some elements in the discourse is dependent on that of another. It concludes that the one element presupposes the other. The element cannot be effectively decoded except by recourse to it. Moreover, the basic concept of it is a semantic one. It refers to relations of meaning that exists within the text. So, when this happens, a relation of cohesion is set up, and the two elements, the presupposing and the presupposed, are thereby integrated into a text. Halliday and Hasan (1976: 39) classify grammatical cohesion into reference, substitution, ellipsis and conjunction. Substitution Substitution is a relation between linguistic items, such as words or phrases or in the other word, it is a relation on the lexico-grammatical level, the level of grammar and vocabulary, or linguistic form. It is also usually as relation in the wording rather than in the meaning. The criterion is the gram

Lexical Cohesion in Discourse Analysis

Lexical Cohesion Lexical cohesion comes about through the selection of items that are related in some way to those that have gone before (Halliday, 1985: 310). Types of lexical cohesion are repetition, synonymy and collocation. Furthermore, Halliday and Hasan (1976: 288) divide types of lexical cohesion into reiteration (repetition, synonymy or near-synonym, superordinate and general word) and collocation.

Ellipsis in Discourse Analysis

The essential characteristic of ellipsis is something that is present in the selection of underlying (systematic) option that omitted in the structure. According to Halliday and Hasan (1976: 143), ellipsis can be regarded as substitution by zero. It is divided into three kinds, namely nominal ellipsis, verbal ellipsis, and clausal ellipsis. 1)         Nominal Ellipsis Nominal ellipsis means the ellipsis within the nominal group or the common noun that may be omitted and the function of head taken on by one of other elements (deictic, numerative, epithet or classifier). The deictic is normally a determiner, the numerative is a numeral or other quantifier, the epithet is an adjective and the classifier is a noun. According to Hassan and Halliday, this is more frequently a deictic or a numeral than epithet or classifier. The most characteristic instances of ellipsis, therefore are those with deictic or numerative as head.