Langsung ke konten utama

Let's "Misuh" Together: Using Verbal Abuse in Suitable Moments

speak verbal abuse

Words are the vehicles by which we exchange our thoughts and feelings with others. Words can communicate our perspective about something to someone. The messages can be positively and negatively. Good words communicate good messages and bad words shows bad messages. In reality, such interpretations can be wrong. Words, both good and bad words, can have different messages depend on the contexts we uttered the words. It also happens in uttering verbal abuse. The messages of the verbal abuse do not always bad. Verbal abuse can show intimate of a relationship, politeness, amusement, etc. It depends on the context. So, this paper tries to analyze Javanese verbal abuse meaning in different context using pragmatics analysis. The analysis uses speech act theory. The information of this paper will help communicator to create a communication into situations where the right words, spoken in the right way, at the right time.
Verbal abuse or pisuhan (in Javanese language) is often used in the daily life. Every language in the world including Javanese language has verbal abuse. Verbal abuse is unique words expressed culture where the verbal abuse used. It is unique because the verbal abuse often comes from strange vocabulary of a language. Because the uniqueness, the verbal abuse became very popular. Verbal abuse give special sensation toward communicators used it in a communication.

            Even if verbal abuse is popular, verbal abuse is bad word in social values and norms. The vocabulary used in verbal abuse often a prohibited vocabulary in a society. Verbal abuse is used usually to communicate bad expression for someone. By using verbal abuse someone can be hurt. Moreover, verbal language can create not only individual conflict but also horizontal conflict among the society.
            On the other hand, sensations of verbal abuse can create an intimate relationship and amusing condition. People, especially male; often use it to express their intimateness with other men. In a comedy program on TV, verbal abuse also often uttered as a trigger in making funny condition. In this part, verbal abuse is needed and must be kept.
            The goodness and badness of verbal abuse depend on the context where, when, and with whom it is uttered. The contexts must be analyzed in order to be able to create a good communication. Theory in linguistics which can analyze relation between words, contexts, and meaning is pragmatics. Pragmatics theory has several steps in analyze meaning. One of them is speech act. Speech act differ an utterance into locution, illocution, and per locution. By using the part of speech act, the relations between context and meaning will be seemed clearly.

Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Ellipsis in Discourse Analysis

The essential characteristic of ellipsis is something that is present in the selection of underlying (systematic) option that omitted in the structure. According to Halliday and Hasan (1976: 143), ellipsis can be regarded as substitution by zero. It is divided into three kinds, namely nominal ellipsis, verbal ellipsis, and clausal ellipsis. 1)         Nominal Ellipsis Nominal ellipsis means the ellipsis within the nominal group or the common noun that may be omitted and the function of head taken on by one of other elements (deictic, numerative, epithet or classifier). The deictic is normally a determiner, the numerative is a numeral or other quantifier, the epithet is an adjective and the classifier is a noun. According to Hassan and Halliday, this is more frequently a deictic or a numeral than epithet or classifier. The most characteristic instances of ellipsis, therefore are those with deictic or numerative as head.

Lexical Cohesion in Discourse Analysis

Lexical Cohesion Lexical cohesion comes about through the selection of items that are related in some way to those that have gone before (Halliday, 1985: 310). Types of lexical cohesion are repetition, synonymy and collocation. Furthermore, Halliday and Hasan (1976: 288) divide types of lexical cohesion into reiteration (repetition, synonymy or near-synonym, superordinate and general word) and collocation.

Substitution: A Grammatical Cohesion

Grammatical Cohesion According to Halliday and Hasan (1976: 4), cohesion occurs when the interpretation of some elements in the discourse is dependent on that of another. It concludes that the one element presupposes the other. The element cannot be effectively decoded except by recourse to it. Moreover, the basic concept of it is a semantic one. It refers to relations of meaning that exists within the text. So, when this happens, a relation of cohesion is set up, and the two elements, the presupposing and the presupposed, are thereby integrated into a text. Halliday and Hasan (1976: 39) classify grammatical cohesion into reference, substitution, ellipsis and conjunction. Substitution Substitution is a relation between linguistic items, such as words or phrases or in the other word, it is a relation on the lexico-grammatical level, the level of grammar and vocabulary, or linguistic form. It is also usually as relation in the wording rather than in the meaning. The criterion is the gram