Langsung ke konten utama

Conjunction; A Grammatical Cohesion in Discourse Analysis

Conjunction
Conjunctive elements are cohesive not in themselves but indirectly, by virtue of their specific meanings; they are nor primarily devices for reaching out into the preceding (or following) text, but they express certain meaning which presuppose the presence of other components in the discourse (Halliday and Hasan, 1976: 226). Hasan and Halliday (1976: 238) adopt a scheme of just four categories, namely additive, adversative, causal, and temporal. According to Halliday in An Introduction to Functional Grammar (1985: 303), cunjuction is classified into elaboration, extention, and enchancement.

1)        Elaboration
Elaboration means one clause that expands another by elaborating on it (o some portion of it) by restating in other words, specifying in grater detail, commenting, or exemplifying (Halliday, 1985: 196). There are two categories of elaborative relation, namely apposition and clarification.
a)        Apposition
According to Kridalaksana (1993: 16) apposition is a word or phrase which explains other preceding phrase or clause. In this type of elaboration some element is re-presented, or restated, either by exposition or example. Look at the example below:
(1)   Expository: in other word, that is (to stay), I mean (to say), to put it another way.
(2)   Exemplifying: for example, for instance, thus, to illustrate.
b)       Clarification
Here, the elaborated element is not simply restated but reinstated, summarized, made more precise or in some other way clarified for the purposes of discourse:
(1)   Corrective: or, rather, at least, to be more precise
(2)   Distractive: by the way, incidentally
(3)   Dismissive: in any case, anyway, leaving that a side
(4)   Particularizing: in particular, more especially
(5)   Resumptive: as I was saying, to resume, to get back to the pint
(6)   Summative:  in short, to sum up, in conclusion, briefly
(7)   Verifactive: actually, as a matter of fact, in fact

2)        Extension
Extension means one clause expands another by extending beyond it by adding some new element, giving an exception to it, or offering an alternative (Halliday, 1985: 197). Extension involves either addition, adversative, or variation.
a)        Addition
Additive conjunction acts to structurally coordinate or link by adding to the presupposed item divided into positive (and, also, moreover, in addition) and negative (nor).

b)       Adversative
It is conjunction which relates two clauses that state contras each other (Kridalaksana, 1993: 117). It acts also to indicate contrary to expectation and signaled by but, yet, on the other hand, however.

c)        Variation
Variation includes replacive ‘instead’, subtractive ‘except’ and alternative ‘or’ types.
(1)   Replacive: on contrary, instead
(2)   Subtractive: apart from that, except
(3)   Alternative: alternatively

3)        Enhancement
Enhancement means one clause expands another by embellishing around it by qualifying it with some circumstantial feature of time, place, cause or condition (Halliday, 1985: 197). The various types of enhancement that create cohesion are spatio-temporal, manner, causal-conditional, and  matter.
a)        Spatio-temporal
Spatial relations are being used as text-creating cohesive devices and the most apparently spatial cohesion is in terms of metaphorical space, for example there in there you’re wrong. Whereas temporal conjunctions are then, next, afterwards, just then, before that, in the end, at once, soon, next time, next day, meanwhile, at this moment, etc.



b)       Manner
Manner conjunctives create cohesion by comparison and by reference to means. They are likewise, similarity, in different way.

c)        Causal – conditional
In many types of discourse the relation of cause figures very prominently as a cohesive agent. Some cause expressions are general, others relate more specifically to result, reason or purpose: so, then, therefore, in consequence, on account of this, for that purpose, etc. While conditional conjunctions are subdivided into positive (then, in that case, in that event, under the circumstances), negative (otherwise, if not), and concessive (yet, still, though, despite this, however, even so, all the same, nevertheless).

d)       Matter
Here cohesion is established by reference to the ‘matter’ that has gone before. Typical expressions are here, there, as to that, in that respect, in other respect, elsewhere.

Komentar

  1. Salam, saya mau tanya refrensi, Halliday tahun 1985 judul buknya apa dan edisi ke berapa? Terimakasih

    BalasHapus

Posting Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Substitution: A Grammatical Cohesion

Grammatical Cohesion According to Halliday and Hasan (1976: 4), cohesion occurs when the interpretation of some elements in the discourse is dependent on that of another. It concludes that the one element presupposes the other. The element cannot be effectively decoded except by recourse to it. Moreover, the basic concept of it is a semantic one. It refers to relations of meaning that exists within the text. So, when this happens, a relation of cohesion is set up, and the two elements, the presupposing and the presupposed, are thereby integrated into a text. Halliday and Hasan (1976: 39) classify grammatical cohesion into reference, substitution, ellipsis and conjunction. Substitution Substitution is a relation between linguistic items, such as words or phrases or in the other word, it is a relation on the lexico-grammatical level, the level of grammar and vocabulary, or linguistic form. It is also usually as relation in the wording rather than in the meaning. The criterion is the gram

Lexical Cohesion in Discourse Analysis

Lexical Cohesion Lexical cohesion comes about through the selection of items that are related in some way to those that have gone before (Halliday, 1985: 310). Types of lexical cohesion are repetition, synonymy and collocation. Furthermore, Halliday and Hasan (1976: 288) divide types of lexical cohesion into reiteration (repetition, synonymy or near-synonym, superordinate and general word) and collocation.

Ellipsis in Discourse Analysis

The essential characteristic of ellipsis is something that is present in the selection of underlying (systematic) option that omitted in the structure. According to Halliday and Hasan (1976: 143), ellipsis can be regarded as substitution by zero. It is divided into three kinds, namely nominal ellipsis, verbal ellipsis, and clausal ellipsis. 1)         Nominal Ellipsis Nominal ellipsis means the ellipsis within the nominal group or the common noun that may be omitted and the function of head taken on by one of other elements (deictic, numerative, epithet or classifier). The deictic is normally a determiner, the numerative is a numeral or other quantifier, the epithet is an adjective and the classifier is a noun. According to Hassan and Halliday, this is more frequently a deictic or a numeral than epithet or classifier. The most characteristic instances of ellipsis, therefore are those with deictic or numerative as head.