Langsung ke konten utama

When Amazing Aims without any Real Objective

sarjana

Everybody has aim in every side of his or her live. Many young men are dreaming to be somebody, reach, and have beautiful wife in their future. On the other hand, many young women are imagining being a wife of rich man. Both the men and women have their aim of their live. Sometimes, they forget to realize that the aim will be still a dream if they have not any effort to make the dream come true or they are confuse how to make a systematic effort to reach the dream. Beneath it all, actually, they fail to extract the aims into an objective. That’s why we need objective and not only aim in designing a good education.
            An education or learning and teaching activities having aims but have no an objective is like the men and the women. It has really big dream to be high quality education among global education. Like a blind spirit, the dream leads to a pragmatic thinking and lose idealism. Finally, many strange policies are made by an education institution in order to increase the quality.
By the shallow thinking, the institution turns autocratic in making policies and rules related to learning activity and also morality aspects. As what happened several days ago, our “Kaprodi” make a regulation which threats women students of this university who wear jeans trousers will be not able to learn in this university for two semesters. Our “Kaprodi” cannot extract the university aims into more specific objective which need substantial and idealism of thinking. That is very non-academicals policy.    
If our “Kaprodi” knows about how important extracting aim into objective in educational system is, as presented in this book, he actually should see that the most important in building Islamic students is that by designing an effective Islamic learning by its morality aspects not just rules of Islam likes shown by “Study Islam” and “Sertifikasi” subjects at the time. Then, this university must decide the objective of Islamic education into more specific, measured, practical, and logical system.   

Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Ellipsis in Discourse Analysis

The essential characteristic of ellipsis is something that is present in the selection of underlying (systematic) option that omitted in the structure. According to Halliday and Hasan (1976: 143), ellipsis can be regarded as substitution by zero. It is divided into three kinds, namely nominal ellipsis, verbal ellipsis, and clausal ellipsis. 1)         Nominal Ellipsis Nominal ellipsis means the ellipsis within the nominal group or the common noun that may be omitted and the function of head taken on by one of other elements (deictic, numerative, epithet or classifier). The deictic is normally a determiner, the numerative is a numeral or other quantifier, the epithet is an adjective and the classifier is a noun. According to Hassan and Halliday, this is more frequently a deictic or a numeral than epithet or classifier. The most characteristic instances of ellipsis, therefore are those with deictic or numerative as head.

Lexical Cohesion in Discourse Analysis

Lexical Cohesion Lexical cohesion comes about through the selection of items that are related in some way to those that have gone before (Halliday, 1985: 310). Types of lexical cohesion are repetition, synonymy and collocation. Furthermore, Halliday and Hasan (1976: 288) divide types of lexical cohesion into reiteration (repetition, synonymy or near-synonym, superordinate and general word) and collocation.

Substitution: A Grammatical Cohesion

Grammatical Cohesion According to Halliday and Hasan (1976: 4), cohesion occurs when the interpretation of some elements in the discourse is dependent on that of another. It concludes that the one element presupposes the other. The element cannot be effectively decoded except by recourse to it. Moreover, the basic concept of it is a semantic one. It refers to relations of meaning that exists within the text. So, when this happens, a relation of cohesion is set up, and the two elements, the presupposing and the presupposed, are thereby integrated into a text. Halliday and Hasan (1976: 39) classify grammatical cohesion into reference, substitution, ellipsis and conjunction. Substitution Substitution is a relation between linguistic items, such as words or phrases or in the other word, it is a relation on the lexico-grammatical level, the level of grammar and vocabulary, or linguistic form. It is also usually as relation in the wording rather than in the meaning. The criterion is the gram